### Tags

### Related Posts

### Share This

# Conrad Wolfram on mathematics education

Conrad Wolfram, younger brother of Stephen, created a bit of internet buzz with his TED talk last year. His basic thesis is that we should not focus on drilling students in hand-calculations. This idea is of course nothing new, in an article in the BBC’s Listener magazine, February 1st 1962, the late Peter Hilton argued against teaching of mindless arithmetic as you can see from these quotes:

Calculating is a dreadful bore and rotten material for eager young minds

I would teach the child how to use a calculating machine and approximate methods–it is important to be able to estimate the size of an answer, but this is rarely taught.

In this age of machines we do not need inaccurate, unreliable, and unwilling human calculators… Yet we employ eager and fresh minds in arid and sterile calculation although we have no need of their conscripted computations.

As you would expect, I was good at maths at school. But often I was bored. Really, really, brain achingly bored. We spent a lot of time doing tedious calculation after tedious calculation. One teacher gave us 100 exercises to do for homework and as a concession reduced it to 99. I was nearly crying with the boredom, banging my head off the table. Now, if I, someone who was good at maths and actually enjoyed it when exposed to interesting stuff (thank you Mr Milne, wherever you are), found it boring, what torture it must be for those without an aptitude?

For me mathematics really got interesting when we were exposed to *ideas*. I only took mathematics as A-Level because I wanted to be a computer programmer and was told I needed it for that. I was sceptical but had my head turned by ideas such as calculus. I can remember thinking what a clever idea differentiation was, why hadn’t I spotted something that simple and powerful? I was so impressed the day we started differentiation (it’s so clear in mind I can remember it was a Friday) that I tried to explain it to my parents. Calculus was then followed up with complex numbers. The idea of the square root of -1 was such a weird idea and yet, like differentiation, was somehow natural. Why hadn’t I thought of it earlier?

A link to Wolfram’s TED talk is given at the bottom of this entry. However, If you have an interest in the reform of mathematics education, then first watch the TED talk by Dan Meyer that I mentioned back in January. This guy is on the front line of teaching and has some really simple ideas.

I have problems with Wolfram’s talk though. Perhaps unsurprisingly for someone who is not in the business of day-to-day teaching he doesn’t give us many ideas about how to achieve the goal he wants. As teachers know, there is no silver bullet that will solve problems in education. I agree with a lot of what he says. And yet I was disappointed. We are burdened with the practicalities. How do you assess the work that the students do when freed from rote calculation. Often teachers have a lack of familiarity with such assessment (or the computing tools) and yet he seems to expect them/us to effortlessly to deliver his vision.

Also, I think that the major problem with education is not about rote learning. The biggest hurdle I face as a lecturer — and I’ll tell this to anyone who will listen — is that if I set a problem for students, many will look for a worked example in the notes and if they can’t find one will quickly give up and say they can’t answer it.

I would love students to be able to happily tackle a problem they haven’t seen before so that if they get stuck they persevere. If we give students computers, then I fear that setting a problem will result in them saying “I put it into the computer but it didn’t give me an answer so I gave up”.

I’m reminded of the famous quote that to a man with a hammer everything begins to look like a nail. Wolfram enjoys programming. Problem in education? Use programming.

Here’s the video. Make up your own mind.

I found this (http://www.maa.org/devlin/devlin_03_08.html) very interesting. So much so that I bought the book that expounds a much more interesting and engaging form of mathematics education. It’s because of this book that I got a better idea about what doing mathematics was actually about.

Hi Charles,

Indeed a lot of educators feel the same way about “Lockhart’s Lament”. As far as I am concerned students are taught to dislike mathematics at school in the same way that they would be if they learned a musical instrument by just playing scales.

Kevin